Why is Crypto Mining Bad for the Environment?

Cryptocurrency mining is often criticized for its high energy consumption and negative environmental impact. In this blog post, we’ll take a closer look at why crypto mining is bad for the environment and what can be done to mitigate its impact.

Checkout this video:

The Problem with Proof-of-Work

Energy Consumption

The high energy consumption of crypto mining is a major problem for the environment. The electricity used to power the computers that mine for crypto tokens is largely generated by coal-fired power plants, which are some of the biggest polluters on the planet.

In fact, a single Bitcoin transaction uses as much energy as an entire American household does in a day. And with the popularity of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies only increasing, the problem is likely to get worse before it gets better.

There are some efforts being made to make crypto mining more environmentally friendly, but until those efforts gain more traction, it’s safe to say that crypto mining is bad for the planet.


Proof-of-work (PoW) is the most widely used consensus algorithm in cryptocurrencies. It is also the most energy intensive. PoW requires miners to use their computational power to solve complex mathematical puzzles in order to validate transactions and produce new blocks. The miner who solves the puzzle first is rewarded with a block reward, which is currently 12.5 BTC (around $110,000).

The computational power required to mine Bitcoin has increased exponentially over the years. In 2009, it took a single CPU about 3 months to mine a single block. Today, it would take that same CPU about 1 trillion years to mine a single block! The increase in computational power has been driven by the increases in theblock reward and the difficulty of the puzzles (which adjusts every 2 weeks to ensure that blocks are produced every 10 minutes on average).

The problem with PoW is that it is extremely energy intensive. In fact, Bitcoin mining currently uses more electricity than all of Ireland! This is because each miner needs to have thousands of computers working around the clock in order to have a chance of solving the puzzle first.

The environmental impact of Bitcoin mining has been a controversial topic over the years. Some people argue that it is not an issue because the electricity used for mining comes from renewable sources like hydroelectric dams. However, a study by researchers atthe University of Cambridge estimates that 74% of Bitcoin miners are powered by coal-fired power plants!

So what can be done to make Bitcoin mining more environmentally friendly? One solution is proof-of-stake (PoS), which is an alternative consensus algorithm that does not require miners to use their computational power to solve puzzles. Instead, they can simply stake their coins and earn rewards for validating transactions and producing new blocks. This means that PoS is much less energy intensive than PoW and does not require specialized equipment.

Another solution is to use recycled materials for mining rigs. For example, there are companies that reuse old laptops and cell phones for mining rigs! This reduces eWaste and helps make Bitcoin mining more sustainable in the long run.

Alternatives to Proof-of-Work


Proof-of-stake (PoS) is an algorithm by which a cryptocurrency blockchain network aims to achieve distributed consensus. In a PoS system, blocks are usually not created by mining; instead, validators stake their tokens in order to be able to validate blocks. Block creators are chosen pseudo-randomly by the protocol, with chances proportional to their stake. A higher stake gives a higher probability of being chosen as the next block validator.

In return for staking their tokens, validators receive rewards whenever they successfully validate a block. They also incur penalties whenever they act maliciously, such as by validating an invalid block or refusing to validate valid blocks.

There are two main advantages of PoS over PoW:
1) Energy efficiency: PoS does not require computationally intensive work, so it uses far less energy than PoW.
2) Decentralization: In a PoW system, miners that own more computational power have a greater chance of mining new blocks and receiving rewards. This can lead to centralization, where a small number of miners control the majority of the network’s mining power. In contrast, anyone can validate blocks in a PoS system as long as they own tokens. This makes it much harder for any single entity to control the network.


Proof-of-Capacity (PoC) is an eco-friendly consensus algorithm that doesn’t require heavy computations like Proof-of-Work (PoW). PoC relies on storing a part of the whole dataset required to validate transactions and produce new blocks on the user’s hard drive. This is why it’s often referred to as “Hard Drive Mining” or “Disk Space Mining”.

The idea behind PoC is that anyone can participate in securing the network and earning rewards by allocating a certain amount of disk space to be used for mining. The more space you allocate, the higher your chances of being selected to add a new block to the blockchain and receiving a reward.

Since there is no need for expensive mining hardware or high energy consumption, PoC is a much more eco-friendly solution than PoW. Additionally, it’s also much more accessible since anyone with a computer can start participating in the network without any special equipment.

There are several projects that are already using or planning to use PoC, such as Burstcoin, Skycoin, and Phantom.


Proof-of-Activity (PoA) is an algorithm used in blockchains and other distributed systems to reach consensus. It aims to address some of the issues associated with Proof-of-Work (PoW), such as energy efficiency and centralization.

PoA works by having a group of validators, who are responsible for validating transactions and adding them to the blockchain. The validators are chosen by the system in a pseudorandom way, and they are required to put up a deposit (in the form of cryptocurrency) in order to be considered for selection.

When a transaction is made, it is broadcast to all of the validators, who then race to see who can add it to the blockchain first. The winner is chosen randomly, and they receive a reward for their efforts. The losing validators also get their deposits back, plus a small fee for participating.

The PoA system has a number of advantages over PoW. First, it is more energy efficient, since only a small number of nodes are working at any given time. Second, it is less susceptible to centralization, since there is no need for expensive mining equipment or large amounts of electricity. Finally, it is faster and more scalable, since transactions can be confirmed much quickly than under PoW.


The evidence is clear: crypto mining is bad for the environment. It requires a lot of energy to run the computers that process and confirm transactions, and that energy often comes from dirty sources like coal-fired power plants. Crypto mining also emits a lot of greenhouse gases, which contributes to climate change.

So what can be done about it? Unfortunately, there’s no easy solution. One idea is to require crypto miners to use renewable energy, but that would likely make mining less profitable and could drive companies to countries with weaker environmental regulations. Another possibility is to find new ways to process transactions that don’t require as much energy, but that could take years or even decades to develop.

In the meantime, the best thing we can do is try to raise awareness of the problem and encourage people to use less energy-intensive cryptocurrencies like Ethereum or Monero. We can also pressure companies and governments to do more to clean up the power sector and reduce emissions. With enough pressure, we might be able to make crypto mining a little less harmful to the planet.

Scroll to Top